Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi
Büyük Kütüphane
Adres
Yakın Doğu Bulvarı, Lefkoşa, KKTC
İletişim
library@neu.edu.tr · +90 (392) 223 64 64
Google Jackets'tan alınan resim
OpenLibrary'den resim

Clinical Accuracy of 3 Different Types of Computed Tomography-Derived Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Implant Placement. Oguz Ozan, Ilser Turkyilmaz, Ahmet Ersan Ersoy, Edwin A. McGlumpby, Stephen F. Rosenstiel.

Yazar: Materyal türü: MakaleMakaleDil: İngilizce Yayın ayrıntıları:2009. W. B. Saunders Co-Elsevier Inc.,ISSN:
  • 0278-2391
Konu(lar): LOC sınıflandırması:
  • WU 29
Çevrimiçi kaynaklar: İçindekiler: Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery FEB 2009, Vol 67 Issue 2, p394-401Özet: Purpose: Presurgical planning is essential to achieve esthetic and functional implants. The goal of this clinical study was to determine the angular and Linear deviations at the implant neck and apex between planned and placed implants using stereolithographic (SIA) surgical guides. Patients and Methods: A total of 110 implants were placed using SLA surgical guides generated from computed tomography (CT). All patients used the radiographic templates during CT scanning. After obtaining 3-dimensional CT scans, each implant insertion was simulated on the CT images. SIA surgical guides using a rapid prototyping method including a laser beam were used during implant insertion. A new CT scan was made for each patient after implant insertion. Special software was used to match images of the planned and placed implants, and their positions and axes were compared. Results: The mean angular deviation of all placed implants was 4.1 degrees +/- 2.3 degrees, whereas mean linear deviation was 1.11 +/- 0.7 mm at the implant neck and 1.41 +/- 0.9 mm at the implant apex compared with the planned implants. The angular deviations of the placed implants compared with the planned implants were 2.91 degrees +/- 1.3 degrees, 4.63 degrees +/- 2.6 degrees, and 4.51 degrees +/- 2.1 degrees for the tooth-supported, bone-supported, and mucosa-supported SLA surgical guides, respectively. Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that stereolithographic surgical guides using CT data may be reliable in implant placement, and tooth-supported SLA surgical guides were more accurate than bone- or mucosa-supported SLA surgical guides. (C) 2009 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
Bu kütüphanenin etiketleri: Kütüphanedeki eser adı için etiket yok. Etiket eklemek için oturumu açın.
Yıldız derecelendirmeleri
    Ortalama puan: 0.0 (0 oy)
Mevcut
Materyal türü Geçerli Kütüphane Yer numarası Durum Barkod
Online Electronic Document NEU Grand Library Online electronic WU 29 .C55 2009 (Rafa gözat(Aşağıda açılır)) Ödünç verilmez EOL-1397

Purpose: Presurgical planning is essential to achieve esthetic and functional implants. The goal of this clinical study was to determine the angular and Linear deviations at the implant neck and apex between planned and placed implants using stereolithographic (SIA) surgical guides.

Patients and Methods: A total of 110 implants were placed using SLA surgical guides generated from computed tomography (CT). All patients used the radiographic templates during CT scanning. After obtaining 3-dimensional CT scans, each implant insertion was simulated on the CT images. SIA surgical guides using a rapid prototyping method including a laser beam were used during implant insertion. A new CT scan was made for each patient after implant insertion. Special software was used to match images of the planned and placed implants, and their positions and axes were compared.

Results: The mean angular deviation of all placed implants was 4.1 degrees +/- 2.3 degrees, whereas mean linear deviation was 1.11 +/- 0.7 mm at the implant neck and 1.41 +/- 0.9 mm at the implant apex compared with the planned implants. The angular deviations of the placed implants compared with the planned implants were 2.91 degrees +/- 1.3 degrees, 4.63 degrees +/- 2.6 degrees, and 4.51 degrees +/- 2.1 degrees for the tooth-supported, bone-supported, and mucosa-supported SLA surgical guides, respectively.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that stereolithographic surgical guides using CT data may be reliable in implant placement, and tooth-supported SLA surgical guides were more accurate than bone- or mucosa-supported SLA surgical guides. (C) 2009 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

Bu materyal hakkında henüz bir yorum yapılmamış.

bir yorum göndermek için.